Comparative Study of Islam: Anthropological Perspectives A (Masters)
- Course Code:
- Unit value:
- Year of study:
- Year 2 or Year 3
- Taught in:
- Term 1
The course emphasises the diversity of ways of being Muslim found in Muslim-majority states and Muslim communities elsewhere and explores the varying ways in which these contribute to the vitality and complexity of Islam’s place in the contemporary world. It focuses on ethnographic work on Islam and being Muslim from Africa, South and South East Asia, the Middle East and Europe. These ethnographic cases studies, however, seek to prompt wider forms of ethnographic and analytical comparison.
Analytically, the lectures deal with a range of older and new debates that have come to define anthropological thinking about the study of religion in general and of world religions in particular. The relationship between ‘global’ and ‘local’ forms of religious thought and identity, the contours of religious morality and ethics, the status of the book in religious life, the role played performance and emotion in religious experience, the nature of ritual, and the so-called ‘politicisation of religion’ in the context of globalising modernity and violent conflict are amongst some of the key themes we will explore.
Objectives and learning outcomes of the course
By the end of this course students will have:
- an understanding of the historical development of the anthropology of Islam and they will be able to relate this knowledge to broader theoretical questions concerning the anthropology of religion and world religions in particular;
- an awareness of debates between anthropologists concerning different theoretical and ethnographic approaches for understanding Islam;
- an understanding of the patterns of values, practices and discourses associated with Islam and being Muslim in the societies under examination.
Scope and syllabus
In the first half of term we will discuss the emergence of ‘the anthropology of Islam’, situating it within past and current anthropological debates about the analytical validity of categories such as ‘world religion’ and ‘religion’. Anthropologists have engaged in hotly contested debates about these issues through ethnographically rich studies that explore the nature of Islamic knowledge, authority, prayer, ritual and piety. Why do what appear to be insignificant differences in the ways in which Muslims pray often become a source of debate and even violent conflict between Muslims? What is Islamic knowledge and what forms does it take in Islam’s diverse intellectual traditions? How is the authority of those who hold such knowledge manifested? We will cover a range of diverse examples including conflicts between Muslims in Afghanistan over the form of correct prayer, the experiences of West African Muslims of the pilgrimage to Mecca, and the ways in which South Asian Muslims talk about and experience devotion at the shrines of holy men.
The second half of the course turns towards the interaction between Islam and politics. Much early work focused on the ‘politicisation of Islam’ in a world widely assumed to be becoming more secular. These accounts categorised different types of Islamic political activists and asked how far Islam’s apparently expanding role in formal forms of politic life (political parties, elections and governments) marked it as being distinct from other ‘world religions’. More recent works have suggested these studies treated religion itself as an unproblematic category. Anthropologists today, instead, are exploring the diverse ways in which politics has played out in the everyday lives of Muslims. In what ways is ‘the political’ historically and socially situated. Is the notion of Muslim politics a helpful category? How have nation-states sought to define Islam and in what ways have Muslims responded to state-led attempts to Isalmise and secularise society? How have Muslims in countries in Central Asia experienced the breakdown of the Soviet Union and the new types of political spaces that have emerged in its wake? Has ‘globalising modernity’ transformed the shape of Muslim identity formations, political life and religious authority?
Method of assessmentOne written examination (70%) plus one essay (3-3,500 words) (30%)
- Mamdani, M. 2004. Good Muslim Bad Muslim: America, the Cold war and the Roots of Terror. Pantheon.
- Berkey, J. 2002. The formation of Islam: religion and society in the Near East 600-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Rahman, F. 1989. Major Themes of the Qur’an. Bibliotechica Islamica
- Armstrong, K. 2001. Islam a short history. Weidenfield and Nicolson: London.
- Lings. M. 2006 (or any other edition). Muhammad: his life based on the earliest sources.
- Murata, S. and W. Chitick. 2006. The vision of Islam. IB Tauris: London and New York.
- Chitick, W. 2000. Sufism: a short introduction. Oneworld: Oxford.
- Esposito, J. Islam: the Straight Path. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
- Baldick, 2000. Mystical Islam: an Introduction. I.B. Tauris: London.
- Izutso, T. 2002 . Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur’an. McGill Univ. Press: Montreal and Kingston.
- Ramadan, T. 2004. Western Muslims and the Future of Islam
- Bulliet, R. 1993. Islam: the view from the edge. Columbia University Press: New York.
- Ahmed, Akbar. Journey into Islam: The crisis of globalisation. Brookings Institution Press: Washington