After the Millennium Development Goals: Lessons Learned and Future Goal Setting Examined in New Commission Co-Written by SOAS Staff
13 September 2010
A new blueprint for international development has been published in The Lancet, a week ahead of the UN’s major summit about the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). SOAS staff Professor Andrew Dorward and Colin Poulton contributed to the report, particularly the sections relating to agriculture, economics and the definition of development.
The unique interdisciplinary study suggests principles for goal development, including equity and sustainability, after 2015 —the target date for the MDGs. Its conclusions are based on a cross-cutting analysis of the challenges facing the implementation of the MDGs —a set of eight goals to reduce global poverty which emerged from the UN Millennium Declaration in 2000.
The Commission is a collaboration between The Lancet—the world’s leading general medical journal—and the London International Development Centre (LIDC)—a consortium of six University of London colleges, including SOAS, dedicated to interdisciplinary approaches to international development.
Professor Jeff Waage, Director of LIDC, is the lead author of the Commission. He said: “The MDGs have made a significant contribution to development, but more could have been achieved if they were better integrated. From our cross-sectoral analysis, we conclude that future goals should be built on a shared vision of development, and not on the bundling together of a set of independent development targets.”
Nineteen academic authors representing numerous sectors (including agriculture, health, education, and gender) and based in seven countries (including India, South Africa, Thailand, and the UK) were involved in producing the study entitled The Millennium Development Goals: a cross-sectoral analysis and principles for goal setting after 2015. The joint Commission illustrates the fragmentation and lack of synergy between the MDGs, particularly the division of the health MDGs concerning reducing child mortality (MDG4), maternal health (MDG5), and combating HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases (MDG6). The lost opportunities created by limited goals are also explored, especially with reference to universal primary education (MDG2). The focus on primary education means secondary and tertiary education, which is essential for improving future incomes and training health-care professionals to help achieve certain other MDGs, remains underdeveloped.
The authors continue by adopting a definition of development as “a dynamic process involving sustainable and equitable access to improved wellbeing.” Working with this definition and the cross-sectoral analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the MDGs, the authors suggest five principles to create synergies between sectors. These are:
- Holism – avoiding gaps in a development agenda and exploiting the inter-connected nature of different elements of wellbeing, such as health and learning
- Equity – developing targets that do not increase inequity but take a pro-poor approach to improve equity of opportunity and outcome
- Ownership – a need for greater ownership of the process of goal development both nationally and internationally
- Global obligation – the need for the development agenda to be a global framework, such that all countries, rich and poor, have obligations and subscribe to targets for which they are accountable.
The implications of each of these principles is then explored, particularly in relation to its impact upon health, where it is suggested that future health development goals focus on sustainable health systems built around delivering health objectives across the lifecourse.
The UN summit to discuss how to accelerate progress towards the MDGs is taking place in New York from 20-22 September.
For full Commission see: www.thelancet.com