[skip to content]

SEC Results 2004/05

The academic year 2004/05 was the first time that the School used a machine-readable feedback form for its Student Evaluation of Courses questionnaire.  The questionnaire was designed by the School, and was based on the National Student Survey, which itself was first conducted in 2005.  All taught courses across all departments, undergraduate and postgraduate, are covered by this feedback.

Where we are doing well

In answering the following questions, over 85% of responses scored 4 or 5 out of a maximum of 5 (i.e. mostly or definitely agreeing):

  • 88% said that lecture sessions were regular and punctual;
  • 88% said that they attended lecture sessions regularly;
  • 88% said that the teachers in their lectures were enthusiastic about what they were teaching;
  • 87% said that the teachers in their lectures prepared their teaching thoroughly.

Where we could do better

Those areas below scored less favourably, based on mostly or definitely agree:

  • 44% said that the library resources were sufficient;
  • 39% said that they were able to access general IT resources when required;
  • 26% said that they received sufficient support and advice from the faculty office.

School-wide responses to each question

QuestionAgree (%)
1.  The teaching in my lectures 
Teachers were good at explaining things.85
Teachers made the subject interesting.80
Teachers motivated me to work well.68
Teachers were enthusiastic about what they were teaching.88
Teachers made an effort to understand my difficulties.64
Teachers prepared their teaching thoroughly.87
Sessions were regular and punctual.88
2.  The teaching in my tutorials 
Teachers were good at explaining things.66
Teachers made the subject interesting.60
Teachers motivated me to work well.64
Teachers were enthusiastic about what they were teaching.63
Teachers made an effort to understand my difficulties.64
Teachers prepared their teaching thoroughly.71
Sessions were regular and punctual.74
3. The assessment on my course 
The assessment methods were appropriate to the course.71
The criteria to be used in marking were clear in advance.62
Course assessment arrangements and marking were fair.67
4. Knowledge and skills 
I feel confident that I acquired knowledge of the subject.78
The course was intellectually stimulating.81
My interest in the subject has increased.76
The course sharpened my analytical skills.66
5. Student's contribution to the course 
I attended lecture sessions regularly.88
I was well prepared for lectures / seminars.66
I attended seminar / tutorial sessions.72
I contributed well to seminar discussions.62
I submitted work on time.74
6. Language students 
The grammatical explanations given in class were clear.61
The textbook(s) used for the course was/were very suitable.49
There was the right balance between the teaching of speaking, reading and writing skills.46
The stronger students were not allowed to dominate classes.49
Written work was always marked helpfully and returned promptly.57
7. Course organisation and management 
The course was well-designed and ran smoothly.77
The course enabled me to pursue my academic interests.73
I found the overall workload was too heavy.36
I was given enough time to absorb what I had to learn.50
It was clear what I was required to attend, prepare, and do throughout the course.74
8. Support and advice 
I received helpful feedback from teachers about my progress on the course.52
I had sufficient contact with my teachers.61
I found other students helped me understand the course.53
I received sufficient support and advice from the faculty office.26
9. Learning resources 
Paper based course materials were useful.75
Online course materials were useful.48
The library resources were sufficient.44
I was always able to access general IT resources when required.39
10. Overall 
Overall, I was satisfied with the quality of the course.80