- Module Code:
- FHEQ Level:
- Taught in:
- Term 2
Objectives and learning outcomes of the module
At the end of the module, a student should be able to demonstrate…
- familiarity with the ideas of descriptive linguistics
- familiarity with the techniques and conventions of grammar writing
- the understanding of the relationship between language description, linguistic theory and linguistic typology
- the understanding of how to apply linguistic tools in the analysis of data from various languages
- basic skills in linguistic argumentation
- a knowledge of a wide range of core grammatical topics relevant for the description of little studied languages
- the ability to write an insightful description of certain aspects of the grammar of a language
Total of 10 weeks teaching with 2 hours classroom contact per week consisting of a lecture.
Scope and syllabus
This module is aimed at introducing students to the practical and theoretical issues that arise in language description. It will help students to understand the techniques and the data base of contemporary descriptive linguistics.
The first half of the module will introduce general issues relevant for language description and grammar writing. The second half will present concrete examples of how to use descriptive tools by concentrating on selected topics in phonological, morphological and syntactic description and analyzing the structure of one or several non-Indo-European languages.
- Introduction: explanatory vs. descriptive theories of language; the notion of Basic Linguistic Theory
- Grammar writing; types of grammars; structure of reference grammar
- Language description and theoretical linguistics: wh-questions, noun incorporation
- Language description and linguistic typology: relative clauses
- Cognitive universality and linguistic relativity; language and culture
- Issues in morphosyntax: Noun phrases; possessive constructions
- Issues in morphosyntax: Argument structure; Valence-changing operations
- Issues in morphosyntax: Differential marking of core arguments
- Issues in morphosyntax: Complement clauses and finiteness
- Phonological description
Method of assessment
An essay of 1500 on a discussion of a theoretical issue/data set analysis (40%) due on Day 1, Week 6 of the term taught; an essay of 2500 words (60%) due on Day 2, Week 1 of the following term.
- Ameka, Felix K., Dench, Alan Charles, and Evans, Nicholas 2006. Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. Grammar and social practice. On the role of 'Culture' in linguistic rlativity. In: S. Niemeer and R. Dirven (ed.s) Evidence for ilnguistic relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamin s. 161-191.
- Evans, Nick and Stephen Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals:Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 32: 429–492
- Foley, William. 1997. Anthropological linguistics: an Introduction. Oxford: Balckwall. Chs. 5, 10
- Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don't exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11.1: 119-132.
- Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. A guide for field linguists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Payne, Thomas and Weber, David (eds.) 2006. Perspectives on grammar writing. Studies in Language 30, 2.