SOAS University of London


Quality Assurance Handbook


An institution’s quality assurance procedures enable it to assure the standard of its awards and the quality of the learning opportunities it offers to students. The procedures cover the design, approval, monitoring and review of modules and programmes; consultation with and feedback to students; and staff management insofar as it relates to teaching. Some such procedures are long-established, such as the appointment of external examiners, but others are newer, and most have been revised or amended in recent years in light of national requirements, changing student needs and expectations, or specific recommendations such as those following the School’s 2007 Institutional Audit.

Quality Assurance will not by itself create excellence in teaching and learning, but it can be a creative influence for staff and students as well as a necessary guarantee against poor practice. It is also a primary condition of the funding which allows us to continue teaching and research. We must comply with certain requirements, but will in any event wish to improve the quality of the programmes and academic support we offer.

This handbook provides a comprehensive guide to current procedures and systems. These are developed and reviewed through both internal and external consultation. Academic staff are repeatedly involved in shaping the systems and professional service colleagues also participate fully.

The primary intention of the Handbook is to help colleagues to comply with what has been agreed, to understand the formal aspects of our systems, and to appreciate what is and what is not discretionary. I hope that, with the assistance of this Handbook, colleagues will be able to realise the aims we share in regard to teaching quality.

Dr Emilia Onyema
Interim Pro-Director (Learning & Teaching)

This handbook has been compiled to provide a clear and comprehensive description of the School’s Quality Assurance [QA] systems. For each procedure, it lists those who can provide advice and support, and sets out the policy, process and timescale. A calendar of approximate dates involved in various QA processes is available on the QA Sharepoint page.  It is hoped that the calendar, and the Handbook as a whole, will prove useful to academic and non-academic staff as they go through the year – any questions or suggestions for future editions of the handbook should be directed to the Curriculum, Assessment and Quality Assurance Manager.

Curriculum, Assessment and Quality Assurance Manager
Cicero Souza,

Quality Assurance Lead Officer
Chloe Weanie,

Quality Assurance Lead Officer
Sevgi Drorian, 

Curriculum Management Lead Officer
Jo Fung,

Curriculum Management Lead Officer
Farzana Moid,